[INRAD] 1000mp MK V

[Mike Schatzberg]

Hi Stormy:

There won't be a problem, but the Yaesu 2.0 in the 3rd IF won't be as nice as an Inrad 2.1 in that slot.  Personally, I like the Inrad 1.8 in the 2nd IF, and the Inrad 2.1 in the 3rd.  I have had the Yaesu twin 2.0s, and returned them to the dealer.  I have had the Inrad 1.8 3rd IF filter, and found it too narrow for everyday use.  It was too fatiguing to listen with for long periods, but quite a QRM reducer.  I have used the Collins 2.0 mechanical 3rd IF filter with the Inrad 1.8, but in the end, I moved the Collins to the second receiver, and I prefer the Inrad 2.1 3rd IF filter.

The combination of the 1.8 and 2.1 really does a nice job of QRM reduction, and the shift and width controls work very well.  Audio quality is very good, especially with a slight offset of the shift control.

See you soon again on 20 meters.

73 and Happy Dxing,

Mike
WB2AJI
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Gary Storm 
  To: list at inrad.net 
  Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 6:55 PM
  Subject: [INRAD] 1000mp MK V


  Hi all...

  First post to this nice site...Question...any nasty side effects if we use an Inrad 2.1 KHz 2nd I.f. and a
  Yaesu 2.0 KHz in the 3rd I.f. ?
  Stormy
  N7WX


  n7wx at wavecable.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  INRAD mailing list provided as a service by International Radio
  INRAD Web Site: http://www.qth.com/inrad

  To Submit Message to the List: list at inrad.net
  List Help:
  http://mail.inrad.net/mailman/listinfo/list_inrad.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.inrad.net/pipermail/list_inrad.net/attachments/20051015/b30cb14d/attachment.htm