[INRAD] PIN DIODES
Charlie Mazoch Jr.
w5vin at earthlink.net
Wed Nov 30 18:20:52 CST 2005
Hi Tom:
This PIN diode fad started out in the days when Hewlett Packard was
making their series of PIN diodes. There were a lot of them installed
into the FT-1000 Yaesu series. I installed a set into an Icom 735 and
saw zero improvement. I'm in full agreement with your remark about
comments listed on W8JI's and the Sherwood sites. My beliefs concerning
PIN switches in low signal receive path switching is that as
semiconductor barrier voltages increase so does electronic or resistor
noise. The advantages of the PIN is that it acts as a variable resistor
at RF and a 50 ma. forward bias may switch 1 ampere of RF whereas in
the PN junction diode this forward bias must be greater than the
switching current. When one introduces electronic noise into a receivers
front end by using inexpensive or sloppy design and then amplifies it
100 + Dbm it's annoying in the least. I believe that as the Hf noise
floor rises because of man made interference the equipment manufacturers
don't put as much emphasis into low noise receiver design. I say this
because if one looks at specifications of VHF and UHF equipment the MDS
and noise figures seem better. I personally use Schottky diodes as low
level signal path switches. Their barrier voltage is lower, 0.37 versus
0.68 volts for hot carrier diodes. The GaAs devices offer much lower
noise figure and their barrier voltage is less than silicon devices.
This also leads to higher Ft's. I'm not an RF engineer but modification
of my personal equipment has led to less electronic noise. This is by
measuring MDS and noise versus signal. As stated in your e-mail relay
switching is quieter than solid state if one utilizes quality devices. I
believe W8JI's comment was that a 1N4148 PN junction diode was adequate
for low level signal path switching. and a PIN diode offered no visible
improvement on his measuring equipment. In fact he dares someone to
prove him wrong. Not by ear but through testing with good equipment. His
comments on linear amplifier tune up and VHF parasitic suppression in HF
amplifiers are also worth reading. Charlie W5VIN
More information about the List
mailing list